Recent Reading Highlights

Mar 1 2010 | Comments (15)

Thanks to my agent and my writing group, I now have a bit more direction with my fairy tale revision. Happily, this means I’ve finally started to emerge from my reading slump. I’m currently in the middle of a couple of books, but here are some of my recent reading highlights:

Nneil armstrong is my uncleeil Armstrong Is My Uncle & Other Lies Muscle Man McGinty Told Me by Nan Marino

Besides the wonderful voice, something that stood out to me in this great story were the short but telling descriptions of the characters: “Big Danny, who can laugh at dead teacher jokes” and “Shirley is not a person who faces dandelions alone.” I simply love these unexpected and vivid depictions. Since both of these tidbits come at the beginning of the story, they serve as a great introduction to the characters.


The Memory of Earth by Orson Scott Cardmemory of earth

I’ve been listening to this while driving, and it’s been an interesting reading/listening experience. In theory this book could be categorized as young adult; its main character is fourteen, and he’s dealing with issues of identity, faith, and responsibility, all themes that pop up quite often in YA. But it doesn’t read like YA at all, which I think reiterates the fact that YA is defined by much more than the age of the characters.

I would say the primary thing that makes this book adult instead of YA is its pacing; while the prologue hints at a conflict, the first few chapters do little more than establish the world and its characters; it’s not until about the fourth chapter that something actually happens. I can’t imagine that being the case in a YA novel, especially one published recently. Much of Card’s work is read by young adults (I read quite a bit in my younger days) because his ideas and stories are enthralling. But when we start hashing out the differences between YA and adult literature, this stands as a perfect example of a book that could certainly appeal to YA readers but isn’t written specifically for them.


leviathanLeviathan by Scott Westerfeld

I’ve been slowly making my way through this book. Even though I’ve been enjoying it thus far, I haven’t had a chance to sit down and really get immersed in it yet. The world Westerfeld creates is intriguing, and the story so far is engaging and fun. But what I think most stands out to me about this book is its overall design. Its illustrations are perfect for the story, and everything from the trim size to the endpapers is flawless. I love when book design perfectly complements the story!

What have you found in your reading adventures recently? Any highlights you’d like to share?


For more blog posts, click here.

Comments (15) »

  • Jon Arntson says:

    GOING BOVINE, just finished yesterday. It’s weird, but it’s good.

    THE MAZE RUNNER should be on everyone’s list.
    Okay, just go here:
    http://www.goodreads.com/review/list/2417286-jonathon-arntson?shelf=all-time-faves-in-order

  • I just finished reading Fire, and…was a little disappointed. I like Graceling better. The first three quarters of Fire was filled with telling and not much action. But, it was still intriguing and I finished the book. The ending was terrific. I would recommend it but just prepared for the slow pace. It just goes to show that if the writing is excellent, you can get away with almost anything.

  • MG Higgins says:

    I’ve read both NAIMU and Leviathan. Both wonderful, wonderful books (for very different reasons, or course). I’m reading The Maze Runner right now and I’m with Jon–it’s wonderful. Really gripping. And I totally agree with what Paula had to say about Fire–and I also preferred Graceling. Sheesh, I’m so agreeable this morning!

  • Jon Arntson says:

    Wow, I am such a minority. I liked FIRE way more than GRACELING.

  • annastan says:

    Ooh, interesting discussion of FIRE vs. GRACELING! It took me a few chapters to get into FIRE, but once I did I absolutely loved it. I felt that the overall story arc was smoother than in GRACELING. However, FIRE was much more internal, so I can see how that might make it less appealing.

    I enjoyed THE MAZE RUNNER as well, though the ending lost me a little bit. I’m very curious to see what will happen in the sequel!

  • Tina Lee says:

    I love this discussion of the two books as well. I totally fell out of love with Graceling at the very end. Well, maybe that is strong, but The last 5th of the novel didn’t interest me as much. So overall I enjoyed Fire more. But it is very internal. So if it hadn’t been for that last little bit, I probably would have given Graceling the higher vote. For a very first book it is amazing. I just finished Shiver and I thought that book just kept getting better.

  • Jon Arntson says:

    The ending totally grabbed me and now I cannot wait for the next. Two against two on Fire!!

  • annastan says:

    Tina, it’s interesting that you felt that way about the last part of GRACELING because I read that Kristin Cashore had to significantly cut down the ending of the book based on her editor’s suggestion. I felt the story was wrapped up too quickly, so it was interesting to find out that was an editorial decision.

    Jon, I like that you’re fueling a battle here! :-) We’ll have to check back after we’ve all read the sequel to the MAZE RUNNER.

  • Anne M Leone says:

    Ohhhh, interesting discussion! I also thought the ending of Graceling was quite rushed, but otherwise LOVED it. How interesting that that may have been an editorial decision.

    Fire didn’t do much for me. I finished it, liked the concept and the world building, but never really got into any of the characters and, like others, found it quite slow. I think one of the reasons I loved Graceling was all the female empowerment going on, and that wasn’t so much of a thread in Fire.

  • annastan says:

    Jon, I meant that in the best possible way. :-)

    Anne, interesting point about the female empowerment in GRACELING vs FIRE. I’ve heard several people say that they thought it was too much in the first one. Both books have some strong themes, so ultimately it seems to come down to personal preference.

  • Jon Arntson says:

    I am not entirely sure why I liked FIRE better…I think because I liked Fire better than Katsa. I liked being in Fire’s head more. Katsa was cool and neato, but too…I cant find the word. Now, I may be a guy, but I am an uber feminist, so don’t start throwing ‘you’re a man’ around, like you women do. Ha. I am also a hypocrite.

  • Judy Palermo says:

    I’ve got both Graceling and the Maze Runner in my TBR pile. I just finished Jumped. Very powerful.

  • annastan says:

    Jon, I think you’re on to something with the two different characters. Katsa is physically strong, but she’s still trying to figure out her identity. Fire seems like a more mature, almost adult, character who’s able to see herself pretty clearly. Because Katsa is struggling with who she is, I can see how that might make her a more challenging character to like.

    Judy, I’ve heard great things about JUMPED. It seems like an intense book – I’ll be interested to read it.

  • PJ Hoover says:

    I adored the Homecoming series by Orson Scott Card. I think it’s my favorite overall series by him, though I do love Ender’s Game.

Leave a comment

XHTML– Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
RSS Feed Syndicate this site using RSS