Total EMLA Takeover: Michelle Ray

Posted by annastan on June 4th, 2012. Filed under: Craft, EMLA, Guest Post, Revision.

I’m hidden away in the revision cave, but I’ve asked my fellow Erin Murphy Literary Agency folks to help entertain you guys over the coming weeks. So today, welcome Michelle Ray, who’s here to give us permission to cut cut cut!


Cutting Ruthlessly (Like Hamlet Through That Curtain-thingy)

I recently decided to turn a historical fiction novel that I’d written for adults into a YA novel. It’s a sweeping drama that takes place over years and across continents with plagues, pirates, sieges, etc. I thought the biggest challenge would be cutting out the often-gruesome content. Turns out the biggest concern was its length. 117,000 words. To make the switch, it needed to be roughly 80,000 words. Gulp.

So . . . what to do about those pesky extra 25,000+ words?

Cut like a crazy person.

Cut like Hamlet hopped up on revenge.

I refer to Hamlet because this post’s title, “Cutting Ruthlessly,” made me think of Hamlet lunging at the curtain behind which he thought his murderous uncle stood. It seemed the perfect revision image.

“But each of my words is so awesome,” you say. “And I spent all of that time thinking of each one.” Yes, yes. Sorry about that. But something must go!

Some advice:

Cut after time has passed.

Look at them dispassionately. It really, really helps when I’ve put the project aside for a while. Even after a few days I’m less attached. Give me a few weeks, and I slash more readily because I’ve forgotten the work that went into the creation.

Cut like they aren’t your own words.

Stop hesitating and fighting. But how to choose?

Imagine you hadn’t written it. What would you think? Is a section boring you? Then it’ll bore a reader. Can you do without that adjective? Description? Anecdote? If so, buh-bye.

What if you choose wrong? In Hamlet, after all, behind the curtain thing-y was his girlfriend’s dad and not his murderous uncle anyway. Hamlet made a huge mistake!

Stop worrying and cut, but . . .

Cut and check the results.

Save your drafts. Use the mark-up feature. Ask for others’ opinion on whether the cuts improve or weaken the piece. You can change your mind. Then go find something else to remove.

Cut the beginning.

Jump even further into the action than you thought possible. With this last revision, I started on page 57. This helped a lot. I was able to use my favorite bits from the original beginning for flashbacks, which, it turns out, can get to the heart of the matter with far fewer words. Give it a try.

In the end, hopefully it’ll be more “happily ever after” than blood-soaked tragedy, but you’ll never know until you begin the slash of the sword – er, delete key.


 

Michelle Ray’s debut novel, FALLING FOR HAMLET, was released in July 2011. She lives in the suburbs of Washington DC with her family, where she tries to teach middle schoolers not to fear Shakespeare. You can visit her at www.michelleraybooks.com.

5 Responses to Total EMLA Takeover: Michelle Ray

  1. Mirka Breen

    Cutting twenty-five thousand words is like cutting a whole novel. You were fortunate to start with such a long work. Wise words from Michelle Ray. Keep up the good work with middle-schoolers. May they grow to be readers of your YA.

  2. Lisa G.

    FANTASTIC advice on one of the hardest things we have to do in revision. Thanks! :D

  3. annastan

    I must admit that I weirdly enjoy cutting things. It’s not always easy, but it can be really liberating. Granted, I don’t think I’ve ever had to cut quite SO many words!

  4. Ruth Schiffmann

    I usually quite enjoy cutting. You can just see the story getting stronger as you slash. But 25,000+ words?! Gulp, indeed!

  5. Kelly Hashway

    Great post. I cut a lot when I edit for clients, and surprisingly, they thank me for it. ;)